Records Management Editing and Proofreading Services
Copies are not spare. Under 36 CFR 1222.12(d), the record status of a document "does not depend upon whether it contains unique information."1 Multiple copies of one document "may each have record status depending on how they are used in conducting agency business."1 The federal definition excludes "duplicate copies of records preserved only for convenience," which is a narrower exclusion than it first appears.2 The regulation makes status turn on how a copy is used in conducting agency business rather than on what it contains.1
Two conditions, and a draft has to meet both
Working files are the case where the rule is explicit. Section 1222.12(c) provides that preliminary drafts, rough notes, and similar materials are records that must be maintained "to ensure adequate and proper documentation" on two conditions.1 The first is that they were "circulated or made available to employees, other than the creator, for official purposes."1 The second is joined to the first by the word and. They must also "contain unique information, such as substantive annotations or comments that adds to a proper understanding of the agency's formulation and execution of basic policies, decisions, actions, or responsibilities."1
A draft that went to three colleagues and came back unmarked meets one condition. A draft covered in comments that never left the author's own directory meets the other. The rule is written so that neither is enough on its own, and a filing decision made on circulation alone reads only half of it.
The statutory definition turns on verbs
The definition in 44 U.S.C. 3301 is built from words the regulations then gloss one by one. Records are recorded information "made or received" by an agency "under Federal law or in connection with the transaction of public business" and "preserved or appropriate for preservation."2 Section 1220.18 defines documentary materials as recorded information "regardless of the medium or the method or circumstances of recording."3 It defines personal files as materials belonging to an individual "that are not used to conduct agency business."3
Section 1222.10(b) then glosses the operative words. Made is "the act of creating and recording information by agency personnel in the course of their official duties, regardless of the method(s) or the medium involved."4 Received is "the acceptance or collection of documentary materials by or on behalf of an agency or agency personnel in the course of their official duties regardless of their origin."4 Preserved is "the filing, storing, or any other method of systematically maintaining documentary materials in any medium by the agency."4
What has to travel with a message
Electronic mail carries a preservation requirement that is easy to lose in migration. Section 1236.22(a)(1) requires that "the names of sender and all addressee(s) and date the message was sent must be preserved for each electronic mail record."5 The stated reason is "in order for the context of the message to be understood."5 The same paragraph adds that an agency "may determine that other metadata is needed to meet agency business needs."5 Attachments that are an integral part of the record are preserved as part of it, or "linked to the electronic mail record with other related records."5 Where a system identifies users by codes or nicknames, or identifies addressees only by the name of a distribution list, the agency retains "the intelligent or full names on directories or distributions lists."5
The same section returns to drafts, and sends them somewhere else. Draft documents "that are circulated on electronic mail systems may be records if they meet the criteria specified in 36 CFR 1222.10(b)."5 That is the general definitional gloss rather than the two-condition test in 1222.12(c), so a draft in an inbox is measured against the statutory words themselves.
Seven named controls, and one system that does not count
Section 1236.10 names seven controls: reliability, authenticity, integrity, usability, content, context, and structure.6 Agencies "must incorporate controls into the electronic information system or integrate them into a recordkeeping system that is external to the information system itself."6 Context is defined there as cross-references to related records "that show the organizational, functional, and operational circumstances about the record."6 Content is the mechanism preserving "the information contained within the record itself that was produced by the creator of the record."6
Section 1236.20(c) then rules one common arrangement out. System and file backup processes and media "do not provide the appropriate recordkeeping functionalities and must not be used as the agency electronic recordkeeping system."7 The provision is about the system of record rather than about how many copies exist.
The schedule is written by someone else
Agencies "must distinguish between records and nonrecord materials" by applying the statutory definition, and the Archivist's determination on that question binds them.12 Which schedule then covers a record is settled the same way, inside the agency. Neither question is put to an editor, and we answer neither. What an editor can do is read a schedule item against the thing it claims to describe. One reading happens when the item is written. The series title goes with the description beneath it, and the retention instruction goes with the event or the period it is supposed to name.
Another reading happens years later, when a paper series has been replaced by an electronic system and the description written for the first is still attached to the second. A term in that description may by then mean something different in the office using it, and the shift shows on the page. Every document that reaches us is private.
Appendix: Who authorizes disposal, and how
Under 44 U.S.C. 3303a(a), the Archivist examines the lists and schedules that agencies submit.8 The Archivist may act where records "do not, or will not after the lapse of the period specified, have sufficient administrative, legal, research, or other value to warrant their continued preservation by the Government."8 The Archivist may then notify the agency and empower it to dispose of those records, but only "after publication of notice in the Federal Register and an opportunity for interested persons to submit comment thereon."8
Subsection (d) covers the schedules that apply across government. The Archivist promulgates schedules authorizing disposal "of records of a specified form or character common to several or all agencies."8 Those schedules reach records that will not, at the end of the specified periods, have sufficient value to warrant further preservation.8
One further provision decides arguments rather than joining them. Under 44 U.S.C. 3301(b), the Archivist's determination whether recorded information is a record "shall be binding on all Federal agencies."2
References
- Office of the Federal Register, Electronic Code of Federal Regulations, 36 CFR 1222.12, What types of documentary materials are Federal records?, current as of August 2026. https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-36/chapter-XII/subchapter-B/part-1222/section-1222.12 ↩
- Cornell Law School, Legal Information Institute, 44 U.S.C. 3301, Definition of records. https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/44/3301 ↩
- Office of the Federal Register, Electronic Code of Federal Regulations, 36 CFR 1220.18, What definitions apply to the regulations in Subchapter B?, current as of August 2026. https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-36/chapter-XII/subchapter-B/part-1220/section-1220.18 ↩
- Office of the Federal Register, Electronic Code of Federal Regulations, 36 CFR 1222.10, How should agencies apply the statutory definition of Federal records?, current as of August 2026. https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-36/chapter-XII/subchapter-B/part-1222/section-1222.10 ↩
- Office of the Federal Register, Electronic Code of Federal Regulations, 36 CFR 1236.22, What are the additional requirements for managing electronic mail records?, current as of August 2026. https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-36/chapter-XII/subchapter-B/part-1236/section-1236.22 ↩
- Office of the Federal Register, Electronic Code of Federal Regulations, 36 CFR 1236.10, What records management controls must agencies establish for records in electronic information systems?, current as of August 2026. https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-36/chapter-XII/subchapter-B/part-1236/section-1236.10 ↩
- Office of the Federal Register, Electronic Code of Federal Regulations, 36 CFR 1236.20, What are appropriate recordkeeping systems for electronic records?, current as of August 2026. https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-36/chapter-XII/subchapter-B/part-1236/section-1236.20 ↩
- Cornell Law School, Legal Information Institute, 44 U.S.C. 3303a, Examination by Archivist of lists and schedules of records lacking preservation value; disposal of records. https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/44/3303a ↩
A worked example: Records Schedule Item
one item from an agency records schedule, checked against the office's own description of what it holds
A schedule item is written once and then governs a series for years. Under 44 U.S.C. 3303a(a), the Archivist examines the lists and schedules agencies submit and may empower disposal only after notice in the Federal Register and an opportunity for comment. The words in the item are the words the Archivist reviewed. Whether a document is a record, which item covers it, and when it may be destroyed are determined inside the agency, applying the statutory definition, and the Archivist's determination on record status binds all agencies. The extract below records what the office says it holds, and it is reproduced unchanged in both panels. Nothing in the revision changes a retention period or a record status, and what the extract does not settle is returned as a query.
Before
SPECIMEN, PREPARED BY EDITFAST FOR ILLUSTRATION. NOT A REAL SCHEDULE.
Prepared for the Office of Grants Administration (fictitious), draft schedule item 4-1
EXTRACT FROM THE OFFICE'S INVENTORY (reproduced unchanged in both panels)
IN-1 The series consists of applications, reviewer comment forms, and award or declination letters.
IN-2 Since 2019 the series has been created and maintained in the grants management system. No paper is created.
IN-3 Reviewer comments are entered in the system by named reviewers and are visible to the program officer.
IN-4 The office reports that the retention it wants is six years, counted from the close of the award.
IN-5 The office uses the word file to mean an application and everything attached to it.
IN-6 The office has not stated whether declined applications close on the date of the declination letter.
ITEM 4-1. GRANT CASE FILES
Description: Paper case files containing correspondence and supporting papers relating to grant applications, including the reviewer's working notes.
Disposition: Temporary. Destroy 6 years after cutoff.
After
SPECIMEN, PREPARED BY EDITFAST FOR ILLUSTRATION. NOT A REAL SCHEDULE.
Prepared for the Office of Grants Administration (fictitious), draft schedule item 4-1
EXTRACT FROM THE OFFICE'S INVENTORY (reproduced unchanged in both panels)
IN-1 The series consists of applications, reviewer comment forms, and award or declination letters.
IN-2 Since 2019 the series has been created and maintained in the grants management system. No paper is created.
IN-3 Reviewer comments are entered in the system by named reviewers and are visible to the program officer.
IN-4 The office reports that the retention it wants is six years, counted from the close of the award.
IN-5 The office uses the word file to mean an application and everything attached to it.
IN-6 The office has not stated whether declined applications close on the date of the declination letter.
ITEM 4-1. GRANT CASE FILES
Description: Electronic case files in the grants management system, consisting of applications, reviewer comment forms, and award or declination letters. A file is an application and everything attached to it.
Disposition: Temporary. Destroy 6 years after the close of the award.
[Query to the records officer: IN-6 does not say what closes a declined application. As written, the disposition has no starting date for a declination, and the wording will not tell a later reader what to count from.]
[Query to the records officer: the draft description said reviewer's working notes. IN-3 records reviewer comments entered by named reviewers and visible to the program officer, which is a different thing from working notes, and 36 CFR 1222.12(c) treats working files under two conditions of its own. The description now uses the inventory's term.]
What changed, and why
| Was | Now | Reason |
|---|---|---|
| Description: Paper case files containing correspondence and supporting papers relating to grant applications, including the reviewer's working notes. | Description: Electronic case files in the grants management system, consisting of applications, reviewer comment forms, and award or declination letters. / [Query to the records officer: the draft description said reviewer's working notes. IN-3 records reviewer comments entered by named reviewers and visible to the program officer, which is a different thing from working notes, and 36 CFR 1222.12(c) treats working files under two conditions of its own. The description now uses the inventory's term.] | IN-2 records that the series has been electronic since 2019 and that no paper is created, so the word paper no longer names what the item covers. IN-1 gives the three components the office says are in the series, against the draft's correspondence and supporting papers. The working notes phrase is raised rather than rewritten, because the classification behind it is the office's to make. |
| (the description does not define its own term) | A file is an application and everything attached to it. | IN-5 records the office's own use of the word file. The item uses that word in its title and its description without saying what it takes in, and a later reader has no way to recover the meaning from the page. |
| Disposition: Temporary. Destroy 6 years after cutoff. | Disposition: Temporary. Destroy 6 years after the close of the award. / [Query to the records officer: IN-6 does not say what closes a declined application. As written, the disposition has no starting date for a declination, and the wording will not tell a later reader what to count from.] | IN-4 gives the event the office counts from. The word cutoff names a filing practice rather than an event, and a retention instruction that does not name its own starting point cannot be applied from the page. The gap for declined applications is raised rather than filled. |
Final specimen (PDF, 4 KB) Marked-up specimen (PDF, 7 KB)
Specimen prepared by EditFast for illustration only. Not a real document, record or filing. Any resemblance to an actual organization, person or record is unintended. Not legal, regulatory, clinical or professional advice.
Key Records Management vocabulary
- Federal record
- Recorded information
- Documentary materials
- Nonrecord materials
- Personal files
- Working files
- Record status
- Adequate and proper documentation
- Recordkeeping system
- Electronic information system
- Records schedule
- Schedule item
- Series
- Series description
- Disposition
- Disposition instruction
- Disposition authority
- Retention period
- Cutoff
- Temporary records
- Permanent records
- Transitory records
- General Records Schedule
- Agency records schedule
- Records officer
- Archivist of the United States
- National Archives and Records Administration
- Federal Register notice
- Notice and comment
- Accession
- Transfer to the National Archives
- Reliability
- Authenticity
- Integrity
- Usability
- Content
- Context
- Structure
- Audit trail
- Metadata
- Distribution list
- Attachment
- Migration
- Media decay
- Technology obsolescence
- Records hold
- Freeze on disposition
- Backup media
Records Management Word Challenge
Even seasoned pros miss these — give it a shot.
« More Professional and Business Services editing | All editing services