Financial Advisors Editing and Proofreading Services
Form CRS does not leave the phrase plain English undefined. General Instruction 2.A tells a firm to "Write your relationship summary in plain English, taking into consideration retail investors' level of financial experience."1 It then says the summary "should be concise and direct," and enumerates five points.1 Three of them are "use short sentences and paragraphs", "use definite, concrete, everyday words", and "use active voice".1 The other two ask a firm to "avoid legal jargon or highly technical business terms unless you clearly explain them" and to "avoid multiple negatives."1
A length limit measured in pages
The limit is stated for paper and then carried across. "In paper format, the relationship summary for broker-dealers and investment advisers must not exceed two pages."1 A dual registrant that puts brokerage and advisory services in one summary works to four pages in paper format.1 Delivered electronically, the summary must not exceed the equivalent of the applicable paper limit.1 Inside that space the items run in a fixed order: Introduction; Relationships and Services; Fees, Costs, Conflicts, and Standard of Conduct; Disciplinary History; and Additional Information.2
Some of the words are chosen for the firm. The guide says firms "must generally use their own wording to address the required items, as well as prescribed language in some instances."2 Prescribed headings appear as written, among them "What investment services and advice can you provide me?" and "What fees will I pay?"1 Firms must also use text features to make the conversation starters required by Items 2, 3, 4, and 5 "more noticeable and prominent in relation to other discussion text."1
What the staff found in the words
Firms had to file an initial relationship summary beginning on May 1, 2020 and no later than June 30, 2020.2 On December 17, 2021, the Standards of Conduct Implementation Committee published what its review had found.3 The statement carries the usual note that it is not a rule and has no legal force or effect.3
The first observation concerns technical language. Firms used terms without explaining them, and the statement names "riskless principal", "in arrears", "markups", and "markdowns" as examples.3 Some summaries added hedging the staff calls impermissible, stating that the relationship summary "does not create or modify any agreement, relationship or obligation" between the investor and the firm or its financial professionals.3 A document written under an instruction to avoid legal jargon had acquired a disclaimer about its own legal effect.
The second concerns firms working from the proposal rather than the adopted instructions. The staff reports summaries carrying the proposed standard of conduct language, "We are held to a fiduciary standard that covers our entire investment advisory relationship with you," rather than the required language as adopted.3 The adopted wording reads "we have to act in your best interest and not put our interest ahead of yours."3 Which sentence a firm owes its clients is a securities-law question. Which sentence the form asks for is not.
The third concerns conflicts. Some summaries "used vague phrasing to suggest the firm 'may' have a particular conflict without also explaining when the conflict could exist."3 The sentence turns on a modal verb.
The same agency, a longer list, a different document
The Form CRS list is close to one the SEC wrote for prospectuses. Under 17 CFR 230.421(d)(1), the filer preparing a prospectus "must use plain English principles in the organization, language, and design of the front and back cover pages, the summary, and the risk factors section."4 Paragraph (d)(2) asks that the drafting substantially comply with six principles, adding a preference for "Tabular presentation or bullet lists for complex material, whenever possible."4 That rule governs prospectuses rather than relationship summaries.
Delivery runs on its own schedule, and separate rules cover the two kinds of firm. A firm registered under the Investment Advisers Act delivers the current relationship summary to each retail investor before or at the time of entering into an advisory contract.5 The firm posts the summary prominently on its website if it has one, and delivers a copy within thirty days of a request.5 Changes go to existing clients within sixty days after the amendments are required to be made.5
A registered broker or dealer offering services to retail investors works to a parallel rule with three triggers.6 Delivery comes before or at the earliest of a recommendation, the placing of an order for the retail investor, or the opening of a brokerage account.6 The recommendation trigger covers an account type, a securities transaction, or an investment strategy involving securities.6
Where an editor stops, and where the firm's own advisors begin
What a firm owes a client, which conflicts it has, and how its fees are arranged are settled by the firm and by its compliance and legal advisors. None of those determinations is ours, and we do not tell a firm whether a document satisfies a rule. Those answers are settled inside the firm.
The questions left over are answerable from the page. A summary uses a term, and its explanation belongs where the term appears. A prescribed heading has particular words, so a paraphrase is a substitution. A sentence about a conflict names a circumstance, and a sentence saying a conflict may arise names none. Client files are held privately.
A relationship summary is read by somebody deciding whether to hire the firm, and later by an examiner holding it against the form. One of those readers wants the wording the form asks for. The other wants an answer.
Appendix: the enforcement record on Form CRS
The first published action concerned filing and delivery rather than wording. On July 26, 2021, the SEC announced charges against twenty-seven firms, twenty-one investment advisers and six broker-dealers, for failures to file and deliver their relationship summaries.7
A second announcement followed on February 15, 2022, covering twelve more firms.8 That release describes firms that missed the deadline and, in some cases, "failed to include all information necessary to satisfy Form CRS requirements."8
Content reached the orders on September 25, 2024, when the SEC charged five broker-dealers.9 The order summary states that "each of the five broker-dealers charged today failed to include required information and language in their Forms CRS."9 Four of them failed to make a mandatory disclosure concerning legal or disciplinary histories, and the fifth also missed the filing and delivery deadlines.9
References
- United States Securities and Exchange Commission, Form CRS, General Instructions. https://www.sec.gov/files/formcrs.pdf ↩
- United States Securities and Exchange Commission, Form CRS Relationship Summary; Amendments to Form ADV, small entity compliance guide, September 9, 2019. https://www.sec.gov/resources-small-businesses/small-business-compliance-guides/form-crs-relationship-summary-amendments-form-adv ↩
- United States Securities and Exchange Commission, Standards of Conduct Implementation Committee, Staff Statement Regarding Form CRS Disclosures, December 17, 2021. https://www.sec.gov/newsroom/speeches-statements/staff-statement-form-crs-disclosures-121721 ↩
- Office of the Federal Register, Electronic Code of Federal Regulations, 17 CFR 230.421, Presentation of information in prospectuses, current as of August 2026. https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-17/chapter-II/part-230/section-230.421 ↩
- Office of the Federal Register, Electronic Code of Federal Regulations, 17 CFR 275.204-5, Delivery of Form CRS, current as of August 2026. https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-17/chapter-II/part-275/section-275.204-5 ↩
- Office of the Federal Register, Electronic Code of Federal Regulations, 17 CFR 240.17a-14, Form CRS, for preparation, filing and delivery of Form CRS, current as of August 2026. https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-17/chapter-II/part-240/section-240.17a-14 ↩
- United States Securities and Exchange Commission, SEC Charges 27 Financial Firms for Form CRS Filing and Delivery Failures, press release 2021-139, July 26, 2021. https://www.sec.gov/newsroom/press-releases/2021-139 ↩
- United States Securities and Exchange Commission, SEC Charges 12 Additional Financial Firms for Failure to Meet Form CRS Obligations, press release 2022-27, February 15, 2022. https://www.sec.gov/newsroom/press-releases/2022-27 ↩
- United States Securities and Exchange Commission, SEC Charges Five Broker-Dealers for Failure to Meet Form CRS Obligations, administrative proceedings summary 34-101183-s, September 25, 2024. https://www.sec.gov/enforcement-litigation/administrative-proceedings/34-101183-s ↩
A worked example: Relationship Summary, Conflicts Section
Form CRS relationship summary, Item 3
The SEC staff reviewed relationship summaries and published what it found on December 17, 2021. One observation was that some summaries "used vague phrasing to suggest the firm 'may' have a particular conflict without also explaining when the conflict could exist." Another was that firms used technical terms without explaining them, and the statement names "riskless principal", "in arrears", "markups", and "markdowns" among the examples. Form CRS itself asks a firm to "avoid legal jargon or highly technical business terms unless you clearly explain them." The inventory below appears in full in both panels. Every arrangement, percentage, and product name in the revision is taken from it, and nothing is added to it. Which conflicts a firm has, and how it manages them, are settled by the firm and its compliance and legal advisors, and nothing here settles any of them.
Before
SPECIMEN, PREPARED BY EDITFAST FOR ILLUSTRATION. NOT A REAL RECORD.
Halverson Ridge Advisors LLC (fictitious) - Client Relationship Summary
THE FIRM'S COMPLETE CONFLICTS INVENTORY, ALL FOUR ENTRIES (reproduced unchanged in both panels)
CI-2.1 Revenue sharing: the firm receives 0.10 percent annually on client assets held in the Meridian money market sweep, paid by the fund sponsor.
CI-2.4 Third-party payments: the firm receives training and event support from two mutual fund families whose funds appear on the recommended list.
CI-2.7 Proprietary products: the firm recommends the Halverson Ridge Balanced Portfolio, which it manages, and for which it receives a separate management fee.
CI-3.2 Principal trading: the firm does not trade with clients as principal.
WHAT ARE YOUR CONFLICTS OF INTEREST?
We may have conflicts of interest. These may arise from revenue sharing, third-party payments, proprietary products, riskless principal transactions, and other arrangements. We take steps to manage any such conflicts.
After
SPECIMEN, PREPARED BY EDITFAST FOR ILLUSTRATION. NOT A REAL RECORD.
Halverson Ridge Advisors LLC (fictitious) - Client Relationship Summary
THE FIRM'S COMPLETE CONFLICTS INVENTORY, ALL FOUR ENTRIES (reproduced unchanged in both panels)
CI-2.1 Revenue sharing: the firm receives 0.10 percent annually on client assets held in the Meridian money market sweep, paid by the fund sponsor.
CI-2.4 Third-party payments: the firm receives training and event support from two mutual fund families whose funds appear on the recommended list.
CI-2.7 Proprietary products: the firm recommends the Halverson Ridge Balanced Portfolio, which it manages, and for which it receives a separate management fee.
CI-3.2 Principal trading: the firm does not trade with clients as principal.
WHAT ARE YOUR CONFLICTS OF INTEREST?
We have three conflicts of interest, and each one arises at a point you can identify.
When your assets sit in the Meridian money market sweep, we receive 0.10 percent a year on them, paid by the fund sponsor (CI-2.1).
When we recommend a fund from either of the two fund families that give us training and event support, we are recommending a fund from a family that pays us in kind (CI-2.4).
When we recommend the Halverson Ridge Balanced Portfolio, we are recommending a portfolio we manage, and we receive a separate management fee for managing it (CI-2.7).
We do not trade with you as principal (CI-3.2).
What changed, and why
| Was | Now | Reason |
|---|---|---|
| We may have conflicts of interest. | We have three conflicts of interest, and each one arises at a point you can identify. | May states neither that a conflict exists nor when. The inventory holds four entries and three of them are conflicts, so the count is available and the hedge is not describing uncertainty. |
| These may arise from revenue sharing, third-party payments, proprietary products, riskless principal transactions, and other arrangements. | When your assets sit in the Meridian money market sweep, we receive 0.10 percent a year on them, paid by the fund sponsor (CI-2.1). / When we recommend a fund from either of the two fund families that give us training and event support, we are recommending a fund from a family that pays us in kind (CI-2.4). / When we recommend the Halverson Ridge Balanced Portfolio, we are recommending a portfolio we manage, and we receive a separate management fee for managing it (CI-2.7). | A list of category names tells a reader what kind of thing might happen. Each revised sentence opens with the circumstance, which is what the staff statement says was missing. The figures and names are the ones already in the inventory. |
| riskless principal transactions | (removed) | CI-3.2 records that the firm does not trade with clients as principal, and the inventory records no riskless principal arrangement either. The term is also one the staff statement names as used without explanation. |
| and other arrangements | (removed) | A closing catch-all adds no arrangement a reader can look for, and the inventory is a closed list of four entries. |
| We take steps to manage any such conflicts. | (removed) | Steps names no step, and the inventory records no management arrangement to name. |
| (no statement of the one arrangement the firm does not have) | We do not trade with you as principal (CI-3.2). | CI-3.2 is the only negative entry in the inventory, and a reader can act on a plain statement that an arrangement is absent. |
Final specimen (PDF, 4 KB) Marked-up specimen (PDF, 7 KB)
Specimen prepared by EditFast for illustration only. Not a real document, record or filing. Any resemblance to an actual organization, person or record is unintended. Not legal, regulatory, clinical or professional advice.
Key Financial Advisors vocabulary
- Relationship summary
- Form CRS
- Form ADV
- Retail investor
- Investment advisor
- Broker-dealer
- Dual registrant
- Registered representative
- Financial professional
- Conversation starter
- Prescribed language
- Prescribed heading
- Plain English
- Page limit
- Text-searchable format
- Machine-readable heading
- Standard of conduct
- Best interest
- Fiduciary duty
- Conflict of interest
- Revenue sharing
- Third-party payment
- Proprietary product
- Principal trading
- Riskless principal
- Markup
- Markdown
- Wrap fee program
- Asset-based fee
- Transaction-based fee
- Advisory contract
- Discretionary authority
- Non-discretionary account
- Account monitoring
- Rollover recommendation
- Disciplinary history
- Legal or disciplinary event
- Investor.gov
- Central Registration Depository
- Investment Advisor Public Disclosure
- Filing deadline
- Delivery obligation
- Website posting requirement
- Amendment
- Boilerplate
- Hedging language
- Marketing language
- Material fact
- Omission
- Examination
- Deficiency letter
- Administrative proceeding
- Civil penalty
Financial Advisors Word Challenge
Even seasoned pros miss these — give it a shot.
« More Finance, Banking and Investment editing | All editing services